ABSTRACT
La plagiocefalia posicional (PP) es una de las causas más frecuentes de consulta en neurocirugía pediátrica. La incidencia de PP aumentó en los '90, a partir de la campaña Dormir de espaldas. Junto con el aumento de la demanda de atención, se verifica un debate acerca de la eficacia de los distintos tratamientos. La interacción padres pediatra orientada a elegir la mejor terapéutica adquiere importancia, particularmente cuando se trata de decisiones sensibles a la preferencia. Es necesario saber más acerca de la naturaleza de la toma de decisiones de tratamiento de PP, para contribuir al desarrollo de procesos decisorios eficaces. Se realizó una revisión narrativa sobre investigaciones en toma de decisiones de tratamiento en PP. Se identificaron artículos en PubMed y Google Scholar (1990 2022) en una búsqueda con los descriptores "plagiocephaly", "decision making" y "parents". Se incluyeron artículos cuyo tema central fuera la toma de decisiones en PP, o que la desarrollaran como parte de otro tema. Se excluyeron trabajos en los que la toma de decisiones aparece de modo secundario o tangencial. Se encontraron 3 artículos con distintos diseños metodológicos, en los que la severidad de la presentación, los elementos socioculturales y emocionales, y los aspectos relacionados con el tratamiento son los factores más implicados en la toma de decisiones. Las relaciones entre la ansiedad parental, las expectativas de tratamiento y la percepción subjetiva de la PP, y el rol del pediatra como proveedor de información válida y confiable son temas que necesitan de ulterior investigación (AU)
Positional plagiocephaly (PP) is one of the main reasons for consultation in pediatric neurosurgery. The incidence of PP increased in the 1990s, after the "Back to Sleep" campaign. Concurrently, the growing demand for care has led to a debate regarding the effectiveness of the different treatments. The parent-pediatrician interaction is aimed at choosing the best therapeutic approach becomes important, particularly when it comes to preference-sensitive decisions. There is a need to better understand the nature of PP treatment decision-making in order to contribute to the development of effective decisionmaking processes. In this narrative review, we evaluated the research on treatment decision-making in PP. Articles were identified in PubMed and Google Scholar (1990 - 2022) using the search terms "plagiocephaly", "decision-making" and "parents". Articles were included if their central theme was decision-making in PP, or if they developed it as part of another subject. We excluded articles in which decision-making appeared in a secondary or tangential way. Three articles were identified with different methodological designs, in which the severity of the presentation, sociocultural and emotional aspects, and aspects related to treatment were the factors most implicated in decision making. The relationships between parental anxiety, treatment expectations, subjective perception of PP, and the role of the pediatrician as a provider of valuable and reliable information are topics that require further investigation (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Infant , Parents/psychology , Decision Making , Plagiocephaly, Nonsynostotic/therapy , Pediatricians , Head Protective DevicesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES@#To study the effects of infantile positional plagiocephaly on the growth and neural development.@*METHODS@#A retrospective study was conducted on the medical data of 467 children who underwent craniographic examination and were followed up to 3 years of age in Peking University Third Hospital from June 2018 to May 2022. They were divided into four groups: mild positional plagiocephaly (n=108), moderate positional plagiocephaly (n=49), severe positional plagiocephaly (n=12), and normal cranial shape (n=298). The general information of the four groups and the weight, length, head circumference, visual acuity screening results, hearing test results, and the scores of Pediatric Neuropsychological Developmental Scales/Gesell Developmental Schedules of the four groups from 6 to 36 months old were compared.@*RESULTS@#The rates of adverse perinatal factors, congenital muscular torticollis, and supine fixed sleeping posture in the mild, moderate, and severe positional plagiocephaly groups were higher than the normal cranial group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in weight, length, and head circumference among the four groups at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months of age (P>0.05). The incidence rate of abnormal vision in the severe positional plagiocephaly group was higher than that in the mild positional plagiocephaly, moderate positional plagiocephaly and normal cranial shape groups at 24 and 36 months of age (P<0.05). The scores of the Pediatric Neuropsychological Developmental Scales at 12 and 24 months of age and the scores of the Gesell Developmental Schedules at 36 months of age in the severe positional plagiocephaly group were lower than those in the mild positional plagiocephaly, moderate positional plagiocephaly and normal cranial shape groups, but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05).@*CONCLUSIONS@#Adverse perinatal factors, congenital muscular torticollis, and supine fixed sleeping position may be associated with infantile positional plagiocephaly. Mild or moderate positional plagiocephaly has no significant impact on the growth and neural development of children. Severe positional plagiocephaly have adverse effects on the visual acuity. However, it is not considered that severe positional plagiocephaly can affect the neurological development.
Subject(s)
Child , Humans , Infant , Child, Preschool , Plagiocephaly, Nonsynostotic/therapy , Follow-Up Studies , Prognosis , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Este artículo presenta el desarrollo de un prototipo de dispositivo ortésico para cráneo de pacientes con plagiocefalia occipital posicional, con el fin de aplicarlo en la rehabilitación de infantes entre los cuatro y doce meses de edad. La geometría del dispositivo se obtuvo a partir de las medidas estadísticas estándar de cráneo para infantes de 6 meses de edad de acuerdo con La Academia Americana de Pediatría y por medio del software GID 8. Los esfuerzos y las deformaciones sufridas por el dispositivo durante su aplicación fueron simuladas por medio de elementos finitos usando el software ANSYS® 10.0. Para estandarizar el tratamiento y conocer la presión aplicada por el dispositivo ortésico en el cráneo del paciente, se elaboró un sensor de presión de aire que trabaja en un intervalo de 0 mm Hg a 55 mm Hg. Los resultados muestran que el dispositivo cumple las especificaciones tanto desde el punto de vista de una validación matemática, como desde las especificaciones del diseño en cuanto a la resolución mínima para las medidas de presión sensadas, confort y resistencia...
This paper presents the development of a prototype orthesis device for the cranium of patientswith positional occipital plagiocephaly. This device will allow the rehabilitation of infants between four months and twelve months old. The device geometry was obtained from statistical cranium measurements evaluated in children of 6 months old by the American Academy of Pediatrics as well through software called GID 8. The stress and strain results were taken from the device during activity, or while the equipment applied some forces on the head; simulations were made by the software of finite element called ANSYS® 10.0. An implementation of air sensor to the device made it possible to know the levels of pressure in a range of 0mm Hg a 55mm Hg. This implementation was done in order to get the standardization of the treatment. The mathematic results as well as the design specifications (minimum resolution of the pressure measurements, comfort and resistance) showed that the device maybe used in rehabilitation.